AppLovin Denounces Capitalwatch Short Report as False, Reaffirms Transparency

AppLovin rejects Capitalwatch's short report, calling allegations false and misleading. The company cites transparent disclosures and full investor reporting.

January 22 — AppLovin has issued a forceful rebuttal to a recent short report published by short-selling firm Capitalwatch, rejecting the document’s claims as false, misleading and illogical. The company said the short report contains inaccurate characterizations of its business and investments and urged investors to rely on official disclosures rather than speculative commentary.

In its public response, AppLovin emphasized that it has provided full and transparent disclosures regarding the company’s material investments, global business activities and financial position through its public disclosure filings. The company noted that its regulatory filings and investor communications present a complete picture of holdings, strategies and performance — information that should guide market participants more than assertions made in a short-selling report.

AppLovin’s statement directly addressed the core allegations in the Capitalwatch report, calling them unfounded and insufficiently supported. By refuting each major claim, the company sought to reassure shareholders and analysts about the accuracy of its filings and the integrity of its corporate governance. AppLovin reiterated its commitment to compliance, accurate reporting and open investor communication.

Market observers often see short reports as a catalyst for volatility, but AppLovin’s response highlights the importance of verifying claims against primary sources. The company urged investors, partners and stakeholders to consult its SEC filings and public disclosures for authoritative information on material investments and business operations. AppLovin also signaled its willingness to engage with the investment community to answer questions and clarify any misunderstandings.

For investors focused on transparency and corporate accountability, AppLovin’s rebuttal reinforces the value of reviewing official documents before drawing conclusions. The company’s position underscores that well-documented public disclosures remain the most reliable resource for assessing corporate health and strategy, especially when third-party reports make contentious claims.

As the situation develops, AppLovin’s clear and comprehensive response aims to restore confidence and refocus the conversation on verified facts. Investors and analysts are encouraged to monitor the company’s filings and official statements for the most accurate and up-to-date information about AppLovin’s investments, operations and governance.

Back